How strange… I didn’t think the tobacco companies could get any more desperate, but this video proved me wrong. Wow, I hate cigarettes.
With love, The Mrs. ♥
Tobacco comanies are just stupid. They are like a horrible person that lies all the time and people just still keep them around…yuck. Smoking has killed many family members who smoked and my dad was looking up the gun man from the old westerns…he would have been old but alive….but he died from cancer…bummer. They didn’t know then. We know now………sheesh…..
well i guess whole milk does have lots of fats in it and maybe that’s why they said that. but still, it can’t be as bad as getting lung cancer from second hand smoke.
Agreed. Tobacco industries are sending out truckloads of excrement.
i inhale soo much 2nd hand smoke,which sucks.but i also like milk.hmm…
That’ll be all the growth hormones they pump the cows with in good ole ‘freedom’ loving USA. Growth hormones which, I should point out, our government consistantly refuses US companies to shove into OUR cows….could be the link between the use of them in huge 20 foot high cows in america and cancer in humans…..but then Crispin Porter and Bogusky probably have a deal with Nesquik on the cards so hey, let’s pretend this just shows some ‘silly talk’ by nasty evil tobacco companies.
You know, whole milk isn’t the best thing for you, I will admit, but one glass ain’t going to give you high cholesterol or make you fat.
On the other hand, all it takes is one cigarette to damage the protective gene in the lungs and start lung cancer.
Hello Derrick, I’m back. You get paid for this? This was the biggest load of crap that I HAVE EVER SEEN. First, a cyber-pedophiliac bear, now, blaming milk industries for “being worse than 2ndhand smoke”? WHUDAFXUP with that? There, I used your term, happy? I still disagree that you should change the term used because it shows YOUR lack of intelligence. Wow, this xanga is the biggest piece of animal excrement I have ever seen, I would rather be kicked in the balls repetitively over the course of a year than know that this is actually “doing good” to show that smoking is bad. You know, you should be against smoking to help young people understand the difference and that they won’t make the bad choices that older adults have made by choosing to smoke, but what this movie clip does is tell people, “2ndhand smoke is better for you than a FRIGGIN GLASS IF MILK!”. You have got to be kidding me, show me 5 sources that are credible that prove that milk can be harmful and I may CONSIDER believing your crap blog. If you can’t, then I am going to start an “ANTI-TRUTH” blog, using my right to speak freely by the way, and show people the real truth, that this site sucks and isn’t doing crap for the anti-smoking ads or campaigns. You my friend, are a failure. I bet that you are a computer. I would appreciate a talk with you, message me or something, give me your phone number to get in contact with you, and I’ll give you an earful. I am giving you one week. Then I am starting my site. Prove to me that 1, you are not an automated bot that automatically types these blogs, 2, that you’ll actually stand up for what you are telling people, and 3, that you are not full of crap. If you were in front of me right now, I’d punch you for being a failure to the world. Get in touch, pjbrochu@gmail.com. By the way, anyone who agrees, disagrees, or doesn’t care but wants to hear me rant, can email me at that address. I am ready to talk. As for you Derrick, if you can’t go against smoking and at least show people the truth that its BAD for you, I’d say get another job or another subject, you failed on this one.
–PJBROCHU
I totally agree with the person above me. Sometimes your adds dont give the message to stop smoking, its just random facts. It helped my friend stop smoking but the one about cows is completely stupid, no offense. Some of them don’t make sense honestly, The one with the stuffed animal as well. I don’t think TRUTH can effect peoples life as they wish they could, addicts will stay addicts until given. I think you guys should be a little more convincing about your commercials. Keep up the great work.
P.S. When you guys visited Staten Island, what ever happened to that footage?
i’d like to see more of this- just b/c i agree that our milk has issues- we’re adults- not really meant to be drinking milk..
and i have to disagree with the whole milk thing- if you have to conventional milk- whole milk is much better- it’s the only way you’ll get any of the vitamins in such a way that you can process them in your body. we do too much processing to be able to assimilate the milk.
a google search should show you info on the dangers of milk
Well WHADUFUXUP with the cow-milking industry? I mean, they pump up the cows with an insane amount of hormones and steroids until eventually its so weak it cannot even stand up on its own two legs. And oh yes, they artificially ensemenate the cows too to put the MAX amount of nutrients in the milk, but therefore degrading the cows knees to a point where they can barely even move.
Oh well…that’s why we’re man and they’re beast.
The government has always viewed animals as secondary to humans for a reason, sorry llama guy (or gal).
Annoying. God-awful and annoying. May have been more insightful, if the guy wasn’t a cross between Buddy Holly, Weird Al, and some Jamaican pot dealer with a Canadian accent. I cringe when I see this guy on television. Sure, I understand it’s a catchy way of advertising your cause, but replace him with a more mild image that’s easier on the eyes, like fetuses being frappe’d in a blender.
I really love this one. I’m so glad I don’t like milk that much anyway. Ahaha.
Oh wait, remember when they found out that second smoke actually has VIRTUALLY NO EFFECT on those who inhale?
Of course you don’t, because you’re propaganda spreading assholes.
Now I’m off to go drink a whole gallon of milk and smoke 16 or 17 cigarettes.
I love what you do…
God re-wards good ste-wards
Sometimes we make the mistake of viewing our resources as coming from our own efforts.
The truth is that our blessings come from the Lord.
If we focus on our bank balance or income, we may wrongly believe that we control our assets. This illusion of safety may be replaced by anxiety if we lose our job or suffer a serious illness.
Fixing our eyes on Jesus will bring genuine peace. True financial security is found in our relationship with the Lord, the owner of all things. It’s not found in our bank account or marketable skills. If security is based on our “net worth,” we’ll rarely feel we have enough money. But once we realize God is in charge of our resources, we’ll rest secure because we know He has our best interest in mind.
So why does Scripture address tithing?
Tithes (there are 3 referred to in scripture) to the local church help the work of God’s kingdom continue.
Another reason is we prove God’s faithfulness when we give 30% percent of our income.
Malachi 3:10-12 says we bring Him honor when others see He’s the source of our blessings.
When our security rests in our relationship with Christ, we’ll be thankful for what we do have and will trust Him for the future.
As the Lord’s stewards, Christians are expected to invest their treasure, talents, and time as He directs. God rewards those who handle His money according to biblical guidelines. Those who don’t will lose out on blessings.
uh are people missing that fact that the point of this video is that the tobacco industry lied about milk?
If you’re not anti-smoking but actually anti-manipulations, why do focus only on the manipulations of the tobacco industry?
Whudafuxup with that?
It seems to me like a manipulation in and of its own, on your part. Now, I’m not a big fan of smoking. I’m currently trying to quit… but your ad campaign is heavily flawed.
Please answer me. Please. I’m not trying to be mean. I’m trying to point out holes so I can help.
i quit smoking 2 months ago and havent even THOUGHT about going back to it. :-] i dont even think about cigarrettes during the day.
SMOKING CAUSES PROBLEMS OTHER THAN LUNG CANCER AND HEART DISEASE The fact that smoking causes lung disease and oral cancer isn’t exactly news, and only tobacco industry executives would express (feigned) shock at being told. But cigarettes can lead to a whole slew of problems involving every system of your tar-filled body, and most people aren’t aware of this.
The American Council on Science and Health’s book Cigarettes: What the Warning Label Doesn’t Tell You is the first comprehensive look at the medical evidence of all types of harm triggered by smoking. Referencing over 450 articles from medical journals and reviewed by 45 experts — mainly medical doctors and PhDs
Among some of the things that cancer sticks do: Besides cancers of the head, neck, and lungs, ciggies are especially connected to cancers of the bladder, kidney, pancreas, and cervix. Newer evidence is adding leukemia and colorectal cancer to the list. Recent studies have also found at least a doubling of risk among smokers for cancers of the vulva and penis, as well as an eight-fold risk of anal cancer for men and a nine-fold risk for women.
Smoking trashes the ability of blood to flow, which results in a sixteen-fold greater risk of peripheral vascular disease. This triggers pain in the legs and arms, which often leads to an inability to walk and, in some instances, gangrene and/or amputation. Seventy-six percent of all cases are caused by smoking, more than for any other factor, including diabetes, obesity, and high blood pressure.
Smokers are at least two to three times more likely to develop the heartbreak of psoriasis. Even if that doesn’t happen, they’ll look old before their time. The American Council tells us, “Smokers in their 40s have facial wrinkles similar to those of nonsmokers in their 60s.”
Smokers require more anesthesia for surgery, and they recover much more slowly. In fact, wounds of all kinds take longer to heal for smokers.
Puffing helps to weaken bones, soft tissue, and spinal discs, causing all kinds of musculoskeletal pain, more broken bones and ruptured discs, and longer healing time. “A non-smoker’s leg heals an average of 80 percent faster than a smoker’s broken leg.”
Smoking is heavily related to osteoporosis, the loss of bone mass, which results in brittle bones and more breaks.
Cigarettes interfere with your ability to have kids. “The fertility rates of women who smoke are about 30 percent lower than those of nonsmokers.” If you’re an idiot who continues to smoke while you’re expecting — even in this day and age, some people, including stars Catherine Zeta Jones and Courtney Love, do this — you increase the risks of miscarriage, stillbirth, premature birth, low birth weight, underdevelopment, and cleft pallet. If your child is able to survive outside the womb, it will have a heavily elevated risk of crib death (SIDS), allergies, and intellectual impairment.
Smoking also does a serious number on sperm, resulting in more deformed cells, less ability of them to swim, smaller loads, and a drastic decrease in overall number of the little fellas. The larger population of misshapen sperm probably increases the risk of miscarriages and birth defects, so even if mommy doesn’t smoke, daddy could still cause problems. What’s more, because smoking hurts blood flow, male smokers are at least twice as likely to be unable to get it up.
Besides shutting down blood flow to the little head, smoking interferes with the blood going to the big head in both sexes. This causes one quarter of all strokes. It also makes these strokes more likely to occur earlier in life and more likely to be fatal.
“Depression — whether viewed as a trait, a symptom or a diagnosable disorder — is overrepresented among smokers.” Unfortunately, it’s unclear how the two are related. Does smoking cause depression, or does depression lead to smoking? Or, most likely, do the two feed on each other in a vicious cycle?
“Smokers experience sudden hearing loss an average of 16 years earlier than do never smokers.”
Smokers and former smokers have an increased risk of developing cataracts, abnormal eye movements, inflammation of the optic nerve, permanent blindness from lack of blood flow, and the most severe form of macular degeneration.
Lighting up increases plaque, gum disease, and tooth loss.
It also makes it likelier that you’ll develop diabetes, stomach ulcers, colon polyps, and Crohn’s disease.
Smoking trashes the immune system in myriad ways, with the overall result being that you’re more susceptible to disease and allergies.
And let’s not forget that second-hand smoke has horrible effects on the estimated 42 percent of toddlers and infants who are forced to inhale it in their homes: According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), children’s “passive smoking,” as it is called, results in hundreds of thousands of cases of bronchitis, pneumonia, ear infections, and worsened asthma. Worse yet, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that 702 children younger than one year die each year as a result of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), worsened asthma and serious respiratory infections
It’s very surprising to note that smoking can have a few health benefits. Because they zap women’s estrogen levels, cigarettes can lead to less endometriosis and other conditions related to the hormone. Smoking also decreases the risk of developing osteoarthritis in the knees, perhaps because the pliability of thin bones takes some pressure off of the cartilage. And because it jacks up dopamine levels, it helps ward off Parkinson’s disease. Of course, these benefits seem to be side effects of the hazards of smoking, so the trade-off hardly seems worth it.
NOW THAT IS THE REAL TRUTH.
HERDS OF MILK-PRODUCING COWS ARE RIFE WITH BOVINE LEUKEMIA VIRUS
Bovine leukemia virus is a cancer-causing microbe in cattle. Just how many cows have it? The US Department of Agriculture reports that nationwide, 89 percent of herds contain cows with BLV. The most infected region is the Southeast, where 99 percent of herds have the tumor-causing bug. In some herds across the country, almost every single animal is infected. A 1980 study across Canada uncovered a lower but none-too-reassuring rate of 40 percent.
BLV is transmitted through milk. Since the milk from all cows in a herd is mixed before processing, if even a single cow is infected, all milk from that herd will have BLV swimming in it. Citing an article in Science, oncologist Robert Kradjian, MD, warns that 90 to 95 percent of milk starts out tainted. Of course, pasteurization — when done the right way — kills BLV, but the process isn’t perfect. And if you drink raw milk, odds are you’re gulping down bovine leukemia virus.
Between dairy cows and their cousins that are used for meat (who tend to be infected at lower rates), it appears that a whole lot of BLV is getting inside us. A 2001 study in Breast Cancer Research detected antibodies to the bovine leukemia virus in blood samples from 77 out of 100 volunteers. Furthermore, BLV showed up more often in breast tissue from women with breast cancer than in the tissue from healthy women. Several medical studies have found positive correlations between higher intake of milk/beef and increased incidence of leukemia or lymphoma in humans, although other studies haven’t found a correlation.
No hard evidence has yet linked BLV to diseases in humans, but do you feel comfortable knowing that cow cancer cells are in your body?
Hmm,
I like the fact that you mention you’re not anti-smoking and stuff
You just like to expose the truth
I like that
I like you =3
But I also like cigarettes
Pshhh
Actually, milk is way more dangerous than secondhand smoke. This commercial is stupid.
I don’t smoke cigarettes. I also don’t drink milk. Both are bad for you…llamas is right, they do pump the cows full of steroids and growth hormones. You may not feel bad for the cow, but those chemicals find their way into the milk humans drink every day. And just like cigarettes, milk can give you cancer. But noooo, the food pyramid (which is brought to us by the good people at the American DAIRY Council) would have you believe milk is an essential part of the daily diet.
I’m glad you guys are exposing the lies and manipulations spread by tobacco companies to keep their product on the market. But please do some fact checking…and maybe expose some of the information that the ADC is covering up, eh? And please drop this secondhand smoke BS, you shouldn’t fight misleading propaganda with misleading (if not completely false) propaganda of your own.
Oh yeah….drink rice milk!
Love,
Nate
Anyone who doesn’t see the sarcasm in this is an idiot.
Milk isn’t worse for you than secondhand smoke, and they’re not saying that.
They just expect their viewers to have brains.
Milk IS worse for you than secondhand smoke. A lot worse.
Well, I must say it looks like the guy in these TRUTH commercials has been smoking a little more then cigarettes. I mean, look at that profile picture. Wow…
I’m kind of amused about how upset a few of you are getting over one silly commercial. Especially the long ranters, man, you guys are hilarious.
I think Truth is putting out a good message, albeit in an odd way. I liked it better when they got a huge group of people to fall over “dead” in front of a tobacco company’s building, then held up the statistic. To me, that spoke loads more than “Milk – More dangerous than 2nd Hand Smoke?”
But yeah, second hand smoke is disgusting. And it doesn’t help those with allergies/asthma at all.
hey, i didn’t know Truth had a xanga. O_o
that’s pretty awesome. i love these commercials. they’re interesting. so, rock on for having a xanga.
Learn something new everyday.
this commercial is pretty stupid but i guess it got my attention. i wouldnt say that milk is worse than smoking or second hand smoke but the hormones they jam that cow full of to make it produce more milk is definitely causing cancer and affecting young kids everywhere. most people wouldnt think of that i guess
wow another dumb ass add that holds no truth at all
Sounds like the tobacco industry’s desperate these days
^_~
you spelled it wrong in the title
I wonder what your motivaton is.
Alright you fudgepacking idiot. Milk is good for you, IF YOU VIEW THIS SITE, PLZ VIEW MINE.
–pjbrochu.
personaly, i consider this add completely useless and misconstrewed. I somewhat underdstand your point that you are against manipulations, and indeed the tobacco industry has a past of manipulatory statements such as in the 50s, 70s, and 80s, however it also has a long history of consumer awareness. In fact many adds that are against smoking are financed by the tobacco industry, and many products such as nicorette also belong to tobacco companies. Therefore, it has been a wellknown and documented fact that smoking is bad for you, not to mention that basic logic and the slightest inteligence suggest that inhaling SMOKE would be a bad thing for ones health. I am personaly against smoking, however i do not beleive that the tobacco undustry can any longer be held responsible for the consumers mistakes and CHOICES. Rediculous amounts of money (in the hundreds of millions) have been “milked” from the tobacco industry by individuals plagued by tobacco provoked cancer. In recent years tobacco companies have been granted amnisty from lawsuits due to the exorbitant amounts they sheld out. I beleive that the focus of adds concerning tobacco should not focuss on the past but on the present and on the best way to convince young people to never smoke. Furtheremore the compain should also be clear and simple in order to appeal to the young, and not like this one where some people think that milk is actualy worse than second hand smoke. I know nothing about the milk industry and problems concerning it therefore i would not permit myself to discuss it. but i hope that my message will be of some help to 1, the makers of this add, and 2, those who watched this add and either didnt understand or didnt like it. best regards
personaly, i consider this add completely useless and misconstrewed. I somewhat underdstand your point that you are against manipulations, and indeed the tobacco industry has a past of manipulatory statements such as in the 50s, 70s, and 80s, however it also has a long history of consumer awareness. In fact many adds that are against smoking are financed by the tobacco industry, and many products such as nicorette also belong to tobacco companies. Therefore, it has been a wellknown and documented fact that smoking is bad for you, not to mention that basic logic and the slightest inteligence suggest that inhaling SMOKE would be a bad thing for ones health. I am personaly against smoking, however i do not beleive that the tobacco undustry can any longer be held responsible for the consumers mistakes and CHOICES. Rediculous amounts of money (in the hundreds of millions) have been “milked” from the tobacco industry by individuals plagued by tobacco provoked cancer. In recent years tobacco companies have been granted amnisty from lawsuits due to the exorbitant amounts they sheld out. I beleive that the focus of adds concerning tobacco should not focuss on the past but on the present and on the best way to convince young people to never smoke. Furtheremore the compain should also be clear and simple in order to appeal to the young, and not like this one where some people think that milk is actualy worse than second hand smoke. I know nothing about the milk industry and problems concerning it therefore i would not permit myself to discuss it. but i hope that my message will be of some help to 1, the makers of this add, and 2, those who watched this add and either didnt understand or didnt like it. best regards
pjbrochus_anti_truth!!! i cannot beleive u just stole my comment, i would appreciate you write youre own comments, thank you,
tell_the_truth_2007
First of all, this is worthless propaganda. I am a non smoker, and tobacco did not state that milk was more dangerous than milk, the World Health Organization said it because the coorelative data showed it to be the case. Second, there has not been one emperical study that shows smoking cigarettes, or second hand smoke, causes cancer. It certainly increases your risk, but even the CDC data will show that of the supposed 400,000 smoking related deaths over1/4 of them are from people 70 years aold and older. In fact, if many of these antitobacco people actually read the data over 1/3 of tobacco related deaths come from senior citizens. Many of them lived over the national age average anyway.
I am allergic to tobacco, so guess what I do. I do not go to smoke filled bars, and I do not smoke, but for all you people who think you have a right to tell a business owner, or property owner what to do whith their own body and their possessions, why don’t you work on taking personal responsibility for your actions. Oh, and do a little research. ou will also see that in the court case where they sued tobacco, the judge said that they “cherry picked” the data that supported their hypothesis, and ignored the data that negated the presupposed conclusion.
Is cigarette smoke annoying? Yeah, a little, but you know what is more annoying? Cry babies who sit around waiting for Big Brother to do something because they do not have the intestinal fortitude to ask someone to put out the cigarette. Exercise your freedoms while you have it people because next they will be taking away your cheese burgers because someone ate too many and got fat!
Jonathan
This is nearly as irresponsible as smoking is, I find it very offensive to use hidden profanity and extreme portrayals to try to educate people. People that smoke know the consequences to themselves and others this is common knowledge today. It’s also common knowledge that most smokers wish they could quit. So showing these commercial are only a way for extreme people to try and employ themselves by showing extreme messages that obviously show that their imagery and satire is more important than helping the World or America which ever they are targeting beat their struggle with addiction. The Money it costs to make these ridiculous and offensive commercial could be better spent on aiding the addicts they are supposedly targeting.
lets put this in perspective how many people have died from an acute case of lactose intolerance or from Hormone infested milk? 0
Others have been talking about how “bad” milk is (with statistics to the chances of milk containing puss, blood, and hormones) yet nobody has died from it. Not every dairy company have these bad elements in there products people are just easily manipulated by alarmists its almost too funny to be true.
also forgot to comment about this commercial. That guy Derrick I dunno but he just annoys me.. something about him reminds me of a failed hippy pseudo intellectual renegade that got kicked out of the liberal party. They need a better spokes person that spews out the usual COMMON SENSE. Everyone knows that cigarettes are poisonous thats just common knowledge. Infact these kinds of commercials MAKES PEOPLE WANT TO SMOKE to spite guys like him!
Comments (49)
ehh…. i really dislike 2nd hand smoke
What’s the point of this video?
well that’s weird…
just.. weird.
COW milk actually isn’t good for you.
But worse than 2nd hand smoke? ha.
How strange… I didn’t think the tobacco companies could get any more desperate, but this video proved me wrong.
Wow, I hate cigarettes.
With love,
The Mrs. ♥
Tobacco comanies are just stupid. They are like a horrible person that lies all the time and people just still keep them around…yuck. Smoking has killed many family members who smoked and my dad was looking up the gun man from the old westerns…he would have been old but alive….but he died from cancer…bummer. They didn’t know then. We know now………sheesh…..
well i guess whole milk does have lots of fats in it and maybe that’s why they said that. but still, it can’t be as bad as getting lung cancer from second hand smoke.
Agreed. Tobacco industries are sending out truckloads of excrement.
i inhale soo much 2nd hand smoke,which sucks.but i also like milk.hmm…
That’ll be all the growth hormones they pump the cows with in good ole ‘freedom’ loving USA. Growth hormones which, I should point out, our government consistantly refuses US companies to shove into OUR cows….could be the link between the use of them in huge 20 foot high cows in america and cancer in humans…..but then Crispin Porter and Bogusky probably have a deal with Nesquik on the cards so hey, let’s pretend this just shows some ‘silly talk’ by nasty evil tobacco companies.
You know, whole milk isn’t the best thing for you, I will admit, but one glass ain’t going to give you high cholesterol or make you fat.
On the other hand, all it takes is one cigarette to damage the protective gene in the lungs and start lung cancer.
Hello Derrick, I’m back. You get paid for this? This was the biggest load of crap that I HAVE EVER SEEN. First, a cyber-pedophiliac bear, now, blaming milk industries for “being worse than 2ndhand smoke”? WHUDAFXUP with that? There, I used your term, happy? I still disagree that you should change the term used because it shows YOUR lack of intelligence. Wow, this xanga is the biggest piece of animal excrement I have ever seen, I would rather be kicked in the balls repetitively over the course of a year than know that this is actually “doing good” to show that smoking is bad. You know, you should be against smoking to help young people understand the difference and that they won’t make the bad choices that older adults have made by choosing to smoke, but what this movie clip does is tell people, “2ndhand smoke is better for you than a FRIGGIN GLASS IF MILK!”. You have got to be kidding me, show me 5 sources that are credible that prove that milk can be harmful and I may CONSIDER believing your crap blog. If you can’t, then I am going to start an “ANTI-TRUTH” blog, using my right to speak freely by the way, and show people the real truth, that this site sucks and isn’t doing crap for the anti-smoking ads or campaigns. You my friend, are a failure. I bet that you are a computer. I would appreciate a talk with you, message me or something, give me your phone number to get in contact with you, and I’ll give you an earful. I am giving you one week. Then I am starting my site. Prove to me that 1, you are not an automated bot that automatically types these blogs, 2, that you’ll actually stand up for what you are telling people, and 3, that you are not full of crap. If you were in front of me right now, I’d punch you for being a failure to the world. Get in touch, pjbrochu@gmail.com. By the way, anyone who agrees, disagrees, or doesn’t care but wants to hear me rant, can email me at that address. I am ready to talk. As for you Derrick, if you can’t go against smoking and at least show people the truth that its BAD for you, I’d say get another job or another subject, you failed on this one.
–PJBROCHU
I totally agree with the person above me.
Sometimes your adds dont give the message to stop smoking, its just random facts. It helped my friend stop smoking but the one about cows is completely stupid, no offense.
Some of them don’t make sense honestly, The one with the stuffed animal as well.
I don’t think TRUTH can effect peoples life as they wish they could, addicts will stay addicts until given. I think you guys should be a little more convincing about your commercials. Keep up the great work.
P.S. When you guys visited Staten Island, what ever happened to that footage?
i’d like to see more of this- just b/c i agree that our milk has issues-
we’re adults- not really meant to be drinking milk..
and i have to disagree with the whole milk thing- if you have to conventional milk- whole milk is much better- it’s the only way you’ll get any of the vitamins in such a way that you can process them in your body. we do too much processing to be able to assimilate the milk.
a google search should show you info on the dangers of milk
Well WHADUFUXUP with the cow-milking industry? I mean, they pump up the cows with an insane amount of hormones and steroids until eventually its so weak it cannot even stand up on its own two legs. And oh yes, they artificially ensemenate the cows too to put the MAX amount of nutrients in the milk, but therefore degrading the cows knees to a point where they can barely even move.
Oh well…that’s why we’re man and they’re beast.
The government has always viewed animals as secondary to humans for a reason, sorry llama guy (or gal).
Annoying. God-awful and annoying. May have been more insightful, if the guy wasn’t a cross between Buddy Holly, Weird Al, and some Jamaican pot dealer with a Canadian accent. I cringe when I see this guy on television. Sure, I understand it’s a catchy way of advertising your cause, but replace him with a more mild image that’s easier on the eyes, like fetuses being frappe’d in a blender.
I really love this one. I’m so glad I don’t like milk that much anyway. Ahaha.
Oh wait, remember when they found out that second smoke actually has VIRTUALLY NO EFFECT on those who inhale?
Of course you don’t, because you’re propaganda spreading assholes.
Now I’m off to go drink a whole gallon of milk and smoke 16 or 17 cigarettes.
I love what you do…
God re-wards good ste-wards
Sometimes we make the mistake of viewing our resources as coming from our own efforts.
The truth is that our blessings come from the Lord.
If we focus on our bank balance or income, we may wrongly believe that we control our assets. This illusion of safety may be replaced by anxiety if we lose our job or suffer a serious illness.
Fixing our eyes on Jesus will bring genuine peace. True financial security is found in our relationship with the Lord, the owner of all things. It’s not found in our bank account or marketable skills. If security is based on our “net worth,” we’ll rarely feel we have enough money. But once we realize God is in charge of our resources, we’ll rest secure because we know He has our best interest in mind.
So why does Scripture address tithing?
Tithes (there are 3 referred to in scripture) to the local church help the work of God’s kingdom continue.
Another reason is we prove God’s faithfulness when we give 30% percent of our income.
Malachi 3:10-12 says we bring Him honor when others see He’s the source of our blessings.
When our security rests in our relationship with Christ, we’ll be thankful for what we do have and will trust Him for the future.
As the Lord’s stewards, Christians are expected to invest their treasure, talents, and time as He directs. God rewards those who handle His money according to biblical guidelines. Those who don’t will lose out on blessings.
Check out this beautiful song:
http://music.aol.com/video/liquid/jars-of-clay/1886438
uh are people missing that fact that the point of this video is that the tobacco industry lied about milk?
If you’re not anti-smoking but actually anti-manipulations, why do focus only on the manipulations of the tobacco industry?
Whudafuxup with that?
It seems to me like a manipulation in and of its own, on your part. Now, I’m not a big fan of smoking. I’m currently trying to quit… but your ad campaign is heavily flawed.
Please answer me. Please. I’m not trying to be mean. I’m trying to point out holes so I can help.
i quit smoking 2 months ago and havent even THOUGHT about going back to it. :-] i dont even think about cigarrettes during the day.
sin city 2 movie trailer 4
SMOKING CAUSES PROBLEMS OTHER THAN LUNG CANCER AND HEART
DISEASE
The fact that smoking causes lung disease and oral cancer isn’t exactly news, and only tobacco
industry executives would express (feigned) shock at being told. But cigarettes can lead to a
whole slew of problems involving every system of your tar-filled body, and most people aren’t
aware of this.
The American Council on Science and Health’s book Cigarettes: What the Warning Label
Doesn’t Tell You is the first comprehensive look at the medical evidence of all types of harm
triggered by smoking. Referencing over 450 articles from medical journals and reviewed by 45
experts — mainly medical doctors and PhDs
Among some of the things that cancer sticks do:
Besides cancers of the head, neck, and lungs, ciggies are especially connected to cancers of the
bladder, kidney, pancreas, and cervix. Newer evidence is adding leukemia and colorectal cancer
to the list. Recent studies have also found at least a doubling of risk among smokers for cancers
of the vulva and penis, as well as an eight-fold risk of anal cancer for men and a nine-fold risk
for women.
Smoking trashes the ability of blood to flow, which results in a sixteen-fold greater risk of
peripheral vascular disease. This triggers pain in the legs and arms, which often leads to an
inability to walk and, in some instances, gangrene and/or amputation. Seventy-six percent of all
cases are caused by smoking, more than for any other factor, including diabetes, obesity, and
high blood pressure.
Smokers are at least two to three times more likely to develop the heartbreak of psoriasis. Even
if that doesn’t happen, they’ll look old before their time. The American Council tells us,
“Smokers in their 40s have facial wrinkles similar to those of nonsmokers in their 60s.”
Smokers require more anesthesia for surgery, and they recover much more slowly. In fact,
wounds of all kinds take longer to heal for smokers.
Puffing helps to weaken bones, soft tissue, and spinal discs, causing all kinds of musculoskeletal
pain, more broken bones and ruptured discs, and longer healing time. “A non-smoker’s
leg heals an average of 80 percent faster than a smoker’s broken leg.”
Smoking is heavily related to osteoporosis, the loss of bone mass, which results in brittle bones
and more breaks.
Cigarettes interfere with your ability to have kids. “The fertility rates of women who smoke are
about 30 percent lower than those of nonsmokers.” If you’re an idiot who continues to smoke
while you’re expecting — even in this day and age, some people, including stars Catherine Zeta Jones and Courtney Love, do this — you increase the risks of miscarriage, stillbirth, premature
birth, low birth weight, underdevelopment, and cleft pallet. If your child is able to survive
outside the womb, it will have a heavily elevated risk of crib death (SIDS), allergies, and
intellectual impairment.
Smoking also does a serious number on sperm, resulting in more deformed cells, less ability of
them to swim, smaller loads, and a drastic decrease in overall number of the little fellas. The
larger population of misshapen sperm probably increases the risk of miscarriages and birth
defects, so even if mommy doesn’t smoke, daddy could still cause problems. What’s more,
because smoking hurts blood flow, male smokers are at least twice as likely to be unable to get it
up.
Besides shutting down blood flow to the little head, smoking interferes with the blood going to
the big head in both sexes. This causes one quarter of all strokes. It also makes these strokes
more likely to occur earlier in life and more likely to be fatal.
“Depression — whether viewed as a trait, a symptom or a diagnosable disorder — is overrepresented
among smokers.” Unfortunately, it’s unclear how the two are related. Does smoking
cause depression, or does depression lead to smoking? Or, most likely, do the two feed on each
other in a vicious cycle?
“Smokers experience sudden hearing loss an average of 16 years earlier than do never
smokers.”
Smokers and former smokers have an increased risk of developing cataracts, abnormal eye
movements, inflammation of the optic nerve, permanent blindness from lack of blood flow, and
the most severe form of macular degeneration.
Lighting up increases plaque, gum disease, and tooth loss.
It also makes it likelier that you’ll develop diabetes, stomach ulcers, colon polyps, and Crohn’s
disease.
Smoking trashes the immune system in myriad ways, with the overall result being that you’re
more susceptible to disease and allergies.
And let’s not forget that second-hand smoke has horrible effects on the estimated 42 percent of
toddlers and infants who are forced to inhale it in their homes:
According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), children’s “passive smoking,”
as it is called, results in hundreds of thousands of cases of bronchitis, pneumonia, ear
infections, and worsened asthma. Worse yet, the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention estimates that 702 children younger than one year die each year as a result of
sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), worsened asthma and serious respiratory infections
It’s very surprising to note that smoking can have a few health benefits. Because they zap
women’s estrogen levels, cigarettes can lead to less endometriosis and other conditions related to
the hormone. Smoking also decreases the risk of developing osteoarthritis in the knees, perhaps
because the pliability of thin bones takes some pressure off of the cartilage. And because it jacks
up dopamine levels, it helps ward off Parkinson’s disease. Of course, these benefits seem to be
side effects of the hazards of smoking, so the trade-off hardly seems worth it.
NOW THAT IS THE REAL TRUTH.
HERDS OF MILK-PRODUCING COWS ARE RIFE WITH BOVINE LEUKEMIA
VIRUS
Bovine leukemia virus is a cancer-causing microbe in cattle.
Just how many cows have it? The US Department of
Agriculture reports that nationwide, 89 percent of herds
contain cows with BLV. The most infected region is the
Southeast, where 99 percent of herds have the tumor-causing
bug. In some herds across the country, almost every single
animal is infected. A 1980 study across Canada uncovered a
lower but none-too-reassuring rate of 40 percent.
BLV is transmitted through milk. Since the milk from all
cows in a herd is mixed before processing, if even a single
cow is infected, all milk from that herd will have BLV
swimming in it. Citing an article in Science, oncologist
Robert Kradjian, MD, warns that 90 to 95 percent of milk
starts out tainted. Of course, pasteurization — when done the right way — kills BLV, but the
process isn’t perfect. And if you drink raw milk, odds are you’re gulping down bovine leukemia
virus.
Between dairy cows and their cousins that are used for meat (who tend to be infected at lower
rates), it appears that a whole lot of BLV is getting inside us. A 2001 study in Breast Cancer
Research detected antibodies to the bovine leukemia virus in blood samples from 77 out of 100
volunteers. Furthermore, BLV showed up more often in breast tissue from women with breast
cancer than in the tissue from healthy women. Several medical studies have found positive
correlations between higher intake of milk/beef and increased incidence of leukemia or
lymphoma in humans, although other studies haven’t found a correlation.
No hard evidence has yet linked BLV to diseases in humans, but do you feel comfortable
knowing that cow cancer cells are in your body?
Hmm,
I like the fact that you mention you’re not anti-smoking and stuff
You just like to expose the truth
I like that
I like you =3
But I also like cigarettes
Pshhh
Actually, milk is way more dangerous than secondhand smoke. This commercial is stupid.
I don’t smoke cigarettes. I also don’t drink milk. Both are bad for you…llamas is right, they do pump the cows full of steroids and growth hormones. You may not feel bad for the cow, but those chemicals find their way into the milk humans drink every day. And just like cigarettes, milk can give you cancer. But noooo, the food pyramid (which is brought to us by the good people at the American DAIRY Council) would have you believe milk is an essential part of the daily diet.
I’m glad you guys are exposing the lies and manipulations spread by tobacco companies to keep their product on the market. But please do some fact checking…and maybe expose some of the information that the ADC is covering up, eh? And please drop this secondhand smoke BS, you shouldn’t fight misleading propaganda with misleading (if not completely false) propaganda of your own.
Oh yeah….drink rice milk!
Love,
Nate
Anyone who doesn’t see the sarcasm in this is an idiot.
Milk isn’t worse for you than secondhand smoke, and they’re not saying that.
They just expect their viewers to have brains.
Milk IS worse for you than secondhand smoke. A lot worse.
Well, I must say it looks like the guy in these TRUTH commercials has been smoking a little more then cigarettes. I mean, look at that profile picture. Wow…
I’m kind of amused about how upset a few of you are getting over one silly commercial. Especially the long ranters, man, you guys are hilarious.
I think Truth is putting out a good message, albeit in an odd way. I liked it better when they got a huge group of people to fall over “dead” in front of a tobacco company’s building, then held up the statistic. To me, that spoke loads more than “Milk – More dangerous than 2nd Hand Smoke?”
But yeah, second hand smoke is disgusting. And it doesn’t help those with allergies/asthma at all.
hey, i didn’t know Truth had a xanga. O_o
that’s pretty awesome. i love these commercials. they’re interesting. so, rock on for having a xanga.
Learn something new everyday.
this commercial is pretty stupid but i guess it got my attention. i wouldnt say that milk is worse than smoking or second hand smoke but the hormones they jam that cow full of to make it produce more milk is definitely causing cancer and affecting young kids everywhere. most people wouldnt think of that i guess
wow another dumb ass add that holds no truth at all
Sounds like the tobacco industry’s desperate these days
^_~
you spelled it wrong in the title
I wonder what your motivaton is.
Alright you fudgepacking idiot. Milk is good for you, IF YOU VIEW THIS SITE, PLZ VIEW MINE.
–pjbrochu.
personaly, i consider this add completely useless and misconstrewed. I somewhat underdstand your point that you are against manipulations, and indeed the tobacco industry has a past of manipulatory statements such as in the 50s, 70s, and 80s, however it also has a long history of consumer awareness. In fact many adds that are against smoking are financed by the tobacco industry, and many products such as nicorette also belong to tobacco companies. Therefore, it has been a wellknown and documented fact that smoking is bad for you, not to mention that basic logic and the slightest inteligence suggest that inhaling SMOKE would be a bad thing for ones health. I am personaly against smoking, however i do not beleive that the tobacco undustry can any longer be held responsible for the consumers mistakes and CHOICES. Rediculous amounts of money (in the hundreds of millions) have been “milked” from the tobacco industry by individuals plagued by tobacco provoked cancer. In recent years tobacco companies have been granted amnisty from lawsuits due to the exorbitant amounts they sheld out. I beleive that the focus of adds concerning tobacco should not focuss on the past but on the present and on the best way to convince young people to never smoke. Furtheremore the compain should also be clear and simple in order to appeal to the young, and not like this one where some people think that milk is actualy worse than second hand smoke.
I know nothing about the milk industry and problems concerning it therefore i would not permit myself to discuss it. but i hope that my message will be of some help to 1, the makers of this add, and 2, those who watched this add and either didnt understand or didnt like it.
best regards
personaly, i consider this add completely useless and misconstrewed. I somewhat underdstand your point that you are against manipulations, and indeed the tobacco industry has a past of manipulatory statements such as in the 50s, 70s, and 80s, however it also has a long history of consumer awareness. In fact many adds that are against smoking are financed by the tobacco industry, and many products such as nicorette also belong to tobacco companies. Therefore, it has been a wellknown and documented fact that smoking is bad for you, not to mention that basic logic and the slightest inteligence suggest that inhaling SMOKE would be a bad thing for ones health. I am personaly against smoking, however i do not beleive that the tobacco undustry can any longer be held responsible for the consumers mistakes and CHOICES. Rediculous amounts of money (in the hundreds of millions) have been “milked” from the tobacco industry by individuals plagued by tobacco provoked cancer. In recent years tobacco companies have been granted amnisty from lawsuits due to the exorbitant amounts they sheld out. I beleive that the focus of adds concerning tobacco should not focuss on the past but on the present and on the best way to convince young people to never smoke. Furtheremore the compain should also be clear and simple in order to appeal to the young, and not like this one where some people think that milk is actualy worse than second hand smoke.
I know nothing about the milk industry and problems concerning it therefore i would not permit myself to discuss it. but i hope that my message will be of some help to 1, the makers of this add, and 2, those who watched this add and either didnt understand or didnt like it.
best regards
pjbrochus_anti_truth!!! i cannot beleive u just stole my comment, i would appreciate you write youre own comments, thank you,
tell_the_truth_2007
First of all, this is worthless propaganda. I am a non smoker, and tobacco did not state that milk was more dangerous than milk, the World Health Organization said it because the coorelative data showed it to be the case. Second, there has not been one emperical study that shows smoking cigarettes, or second hand smoke, causes cancer. It certainly increases your risk, but even the CDC data will show that of the supposed 400,000 smoking related deaths over1/4 of them are from people 70 years aold and older. In fact, if many of these antitobacco people actually read the data over 1/3 of tobacco related deaths come from senior citizens. Many of them lived over the national age average anyway.
I am allergic to tobacco, so guess what I do. I do not go to smoke filled bars, and I do not smoke, but for all you people who think you have a right to tell a business owner, or property owner what to do whith their own body and their possessions, why don’t you work on taking personal responsibility for your actions. Oh, and do a little research. ou will also see that in the court case where they sued tobacco, the judge said that they “cherry picked” the data that supported their hypothesis, and ignored the data that negated the presupposed conclusion.
Is cigarette smoke annoying? Yeah, a little, but you know what is more annoying? Cry babies who sit around waiting for Big Brother to do something because they do not have the intestinal fortitude to ask someone to put out the cigarette. Exercise your freedoms while you have it people because next they will be taking away your cheese burgers because someone ate too many and got fat!
Jonathan
This is nearly as irresponsible as smoking is, I find it very offensive to use hidden profanity and extreme portrayals to try to educate people. People that smoke know the consequences to themselves and others this is common knowledge today. It’s also common knowledge that most smokers wish they could quit. So showing these commercial are only a way for extreme people to try and employ themselves by showing extreme messages that obviously show that their imagery and satire is more important than helping the World or America which ever they are targeting beat their struggle with addiction. The Money it costs to make these ridiculous and offensive commercial could be better spent on aiding the addicts they are supposedly targeting.
lets put this in perspective how many people have died from an acute case of lactose intolerance or from Hormone infested milk? 0
Others have been talking about how “bad” milk is (with statistics to the chances of milk containing puss, blood, and hormones) yet nobody has died from it. Not every dairy company have these bad elements in there products people are just easily manipulated by alarmists its almost too funny to be true.
also forgot to comment about this commercial. That guy Derrick I dunno but he just annoys me.. something about him reminds me of a failed hippy pseudo intellectual renegade that got kicked out of the liberal party. They need a better spokes person that spews out the usual COMMON SENSE. Everyone knows that cigarettes are poisonous thats just common knowledge. Infact these kinds of commercials MAKES PEOPLE WANT TO SMOKE to spite guys like him!